Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 65
HOOPER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48568
Plaintiff: WILLIAM E. HOOPER
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BECHTLE v. MALONE
as 2:2011cv05738
Plaintiff: LOUIS C. BECHTLE
Defendant: CATHY HOOPER MALONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
HOOPER v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv46667
Plaintiff: DENNIS S. HOOPER
Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
IVERSON v. BARNACLE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv01108
Plaintiff: DAVID IVERSON
Defendant: JAMES C. BARNACLE, CINDY G. WATSON, BRIAN V. COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Iverson v. Barnacle et al
as 3:2011cv01483
Plaintiff: David Iverson
Defendant: James C. Barnacle, Cindy G. Watson, Brian V. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOPER et al v. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS
as 2:2011cv66960
Plaintiff: OSCAR L. HOOPER and EMMA HOOPER
Defendant: OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOOPER et al v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv66820
Plaintiff: OSCAR L. HOOPER and EMMA HOOPER
Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00796
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Hathaway v. Hooper et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00675
Plaintiff: Eugene Carl Hathaway
Defendant: Hooper and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIFAS v. COLEMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01486
Plaintiff: RASHEEN NIFAS
Defendant: BRIAN V. COLEMAN, M. ZAKEN, T. BERRIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?