Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cook Jr. III v Fort Wayne Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Jodie Cook Jr., III
Defendant:
Fort Wayne Police Department, Jeremy Hoover, Treven Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
JUDSON HOOVER
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, KYLE MCKINNEY and CASSIDY VANDINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER v. GREYHOUSE et al
as 1:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY EVERETT HOOVER and MIAMI CF (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
GREYHOUSE, T. COCHRAN, DETECTIVE KNOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoover v. Greyhouse et al
as 3:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Timothy Everett Hoover
Defendant:
Greyhouse, T Cochran, Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Clothier et al
as 3:2021cv00678
Defendant:
Matt Clothier, Mat Clothier, Kassy Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Damian M Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. Clothier et al
as 4:2021cv00064
Plaintiff:
Damian M Phelps
Defendant:
Matt Clothier, Kassy Duncan, Dave Viteck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOTTERER et al v. CHRISTMAS et al
as 1:2020cv01280
Defendant:
SPANN, ROBIN BYERS, GRIMM and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DOTTERER and MATTHEW ALLEN DOTTERER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLASCO v. LAVINE et al
as 1:2013cv00788
Plaintiff:
CONZALOS GLASCO
Defendant:
HOOVER, KRAUS, LAVINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLASCO v. HANKS et al
as 1:2013cv00303
Defendant:
BACOTE, CONYERS, ELLIOT and others
Plaintiff:
CONZALOS GLASCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOOVER v. KNIGHT
as 2:2012cv00042
Petitioner:
JESS HOOVER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
