Cases 1 - 10 of 56
HOOVER v. WADDELL et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDELL, ROY A. COOPER III, ELIZABETH N. STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoover v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Lauren Hoover
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOOVER EL v. WADDEL et al
as 1:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDEL, JASON ADAMS, EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER EL v. FORSYTH COUNTY
as 1:2023cv01053
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. HOOVER EL
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoover v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01535
Plaintiff:
James Hoover and James David Hoover
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
HOOVER EL v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00271
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Respondent:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELTON v. FIELDS
as 1:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
DARREN S. BELTON
Defendant:
RONNIE FIELDS, BILL FLINT, MS. GARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH-EL BEY v. MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MOORE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE/DEPT., BILL FLINT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoover v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Samantha Hoover
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
GIBSON v. HOOVER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Gibson
Defendant:
HOOVER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. and MARION ALPHONSE JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
