Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Horton #092674 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Dwayne Thomas Horton
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horton v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Travis Horton
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Horton v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08318
Plaintiff:
Triston A Horton
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00198
Petitioner:
Thomas Horton
Respondent:
M Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Horton v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02114
Plaintiff:
Tony Horton
Defendant:
David Shinn, John McAdorey, Unknown Town and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Kemp Horton
Defendant:
David Shinn and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stem #161904 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Brandon C Stem
Defendant:
David Shinn, Stacy Crabtree, Kristine Harkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Pima County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Geoffrey Townsend, Louis Avila, Pima County Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Horton, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv00926
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Tony Lee Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Horton v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv00634
Plaintiff:
Daniel Horton
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Unknown Jacobs and Unknown Agnew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
