Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Waterman v. Harred, et al
as 24-3012
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MICHAEL WATERMAN
Defendant:
FNU HARRED, Doctor, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in their individual and official capacity, FNU BUCHANAN, Unit Manager, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in their individual and official capacity, SARAH MADGWICK, Health Service Administrator, El Dorado Correctional Facility, official and individual capacity and others
Waterman (ID 126456) v. Williams et al
as 5:2023cv03181
Plaintiff:
Brian Michael Waterman
Defendant:
(fnu) Williams, Jesse Hoses, (fnu) Hofarth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dragoman v. Midwest Hose and Specialty, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01581
Plaintiff:
Kegan Dragoman
Defendant:
Midwest Hose and Specialty and Midwest House and Specialty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Midwest Hose & Specialty Inc v. Freeway Delivery Inc et al
as 5:2017cv00679
Plaintiff:
Midwest Hose & Specialty Inc
Defendant:
Freeway Delivery Inc , Boyd Rowland and Rupert Soliz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hose v. Henry Industries, Inc.
as 2:2013cv02490
Plaintiff:
James Hose
Defendant:
Henry Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Velcon Filters, LLC v. Taylor et al
as 1:2013cv00995
Plaintiff:
Velcon Filters, LLC
Defendant:
Lucian W. Taylor, David C. Taylor, Pear Hose Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Midwest Hose & Specialty Inc v. Freeway Delivery Inc
as 5:2012cv01238
Plaintiff:
Midwest Hose & Specialty Inc
Defendant:
Freeway Delivery Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Stein, et al v. Disciplinary Bd, NM Sup Ct, et al
as 06-2188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STUART L. STEIN and THE STEIN LAW FIRM, a professional law corpoartion d/b/a The Stein Law Firm
Defendant - Appellee:
THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD, OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO, RICHARD J PARMLEY, Chair, JAMES F. BECKLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
