Cases 41 - 50 of 107
Byrdo et al v. Household Finance Corporation, III et al
as 2:2013cv14816
Plaintiff:
Roshonda Byrdo and Jerry Byrdo
Defendant:
Household Finance Corporation, III , HFC Beneficial and HSBC Et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marquez v. Household Finance Corporation III
as 3:2013cv04614
Plaintiff:
Juan Marquez
Defendant:
Household Finance Corporation III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv06921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Gomez v. Household Finance Corporation, III et al
as 1:2013cv24036
Plaintiff:
Libardo Gomez
Defendant:
Household Finance Corporation, III , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS), , Wilmington Finance, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hassan v. Household Finance Corporation, III
as 1:2013cv24009
Plaintiff:
Marlene Hassan
Defendant:
Household Finance Corporation, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HSBC Bank USA, National Association v. Lee et al
as 1:2013cv06069
Plaintiff:
HSBC Bank USA, National Association
Defendant:
Tyrone D. Lee, BMO Harris Bank National Association, Household Finance Corporation III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Menke et al v. Mortgage One Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv01343
Plaintiff:
Wanda L Menke and James I Menke
Defendant:
Mortgage One Corporation and Household Finance Corporation III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Drysdale v. Household Finance Corporation III
as 2:2013cv12992
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P Drysdale
Defendant:
Household Finance Corporation III
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv12469
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
