Cases 41 - 50 of 255
Watkins et al v. City of Olympia et al
as 3:2022cv05554
Plaintiff:
Dontey M Watkins and Rachel R Watkins
Defendant:
City of Olympia, Brooklyn McKoon, B. Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb et al v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2022cv05448
Plaintiff:
David Q Webb
Defendant:
State of Washington, Robert Watson Ferguson, Kitsap County Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00114
Petitioner:
Jason Ray Brooks
Respondent:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stansberry v. Enter Alaska Public Defender Attorney Case File et al
as 3:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy J. Stansberry
Defendant:
Enter Alaska Public Defender Attorney Case File, Sidney Billingslea, Johnson and others
Conger v. Houser
as 2:2022cv00003
Petitioner:
Emerson Scott Conger
Respondent:
Earl L. Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shriver et al v. Olympia Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv05138
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Shriver, Dorcas Githinji and Jason Shriver
Defendant:
Olympia Police Department, Tiffany Coates, Josiah Lutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houser v. Carter, et al.
as 4:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Larry Houser
Defendant:
Sheriff Tom Carter, Jail in Twin Falls and Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Allen Hiratsuka v. Earl Houser
as 22-35180
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALLEN HIRATSUKA
Respondent / Appellee:
EARL HOUSER, State of Alaska Dept of Cor. Superintendent III
Edwards v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00053
Petitioner:
Daryl Clyde Edwards
Respondent:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akelkok v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Constantine Quisto Akelkok
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
