Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Houston v. Dawson et al
as 5:2017cv01845
Plaintiff:
Tavon Israel Houston
Defendant:
A Dawson and Steven Haddock
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Dunn et al
as 5:2017cv01802
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Watkins
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Patrick, Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Houston v. Talladega, City of et al
as 2:2016cv01838
Plaintiff:
Crystal Houston
Defendant:
Talladega, City of, Daniel Chesser, Eric Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Metlife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc.
as 5:2016cv01531
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Dionne Houston
Defendant:
Metlife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Houston v. Hale et al
as 2:2015cv01975
Plaintiff:
Gregory Houston
Defendant:
Mike Hale, Ron Eddings and Cody Christesen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2014cv02344
Petitioner:
Alonzo Houston
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company et al v. Watts Water Technologies Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01883
Plaintiff:
Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company , Chubb Custom Insurance Company , Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy PRPNA1100944 and others
Defendant:
Watts Water Technologies Inc and Watts Regulator Company and/or Watts Regulator Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
