Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mathew et al v. SMZ Impex, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv09870
Plaintiff:
Roy Mathew , Abdur Howlader and Jayson Yesudasan
Defendant:
SMZ Impex, Inc., Farm and Grocery, Inc., Kusum Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Khan et al v. Exquisite Delicatessen Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv09386
Plaintiff:
Asif Khan , Mahtab Alam , Abdul M Howlader and others
Defendant:
Exquisite Delicatessen Inc. , J & J Co. of New York Inc. , Jamil Uddin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mohammed E. Hossain v. Dalilup Rahman Sikder et al
as 2:2013cv08044
Defendant:
Shekander Akon, Aliya, All of the Orphans and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed E. Hossain
Mohammed E Hossain v. Abdur Rahman Bishsos et al
as 2:2013cv02732
Defendant:
Golamali Howlader, Husband of Shani, Anis Howlader and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed E Hossain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mohammed E Hossain v. Altaf Hossain et al
as 2:2013cv00750
Defendant:
Shekander Akon, Khorshed Alom, Robber Alom and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed E Hossain
Mohammed E Hossain v. Farhana Nur et al
as 2:2012cv09185
Defendant:
Abdul Kalam Azad, Mowlana Abul Kalam Azad, Babul and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed E Hossain
Mohammed E. Hossain v. Altaf Hossain et al
as 2:2012cv07714
Defendant:
Mowlana Fazlur Rahman, Dolon, Belayet Ali Shikder and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed E. Hossain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mohammed Hossain v. Ibrahim et al
as 2:2012cv05714
Defendant:
Abris MOM, Ahtick, Abul Kalam Azad and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed E Hossain
Llamas v. B Town Supermarket, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02935
Defendant:
B Town Supermarket, Inc. and Kamrul Hasan Howlader
Plaintiff:
Jorge Cazales Llamas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
