Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, A dim peak, Acen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Williams v. Pontiac CC Administration et al
as 1:2023cv01318
Plaintiff:
Craig Williams and Kathyleen A. Monrose
Defendant:
Pontiac CC Administration, Rob Jeffrey, . Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Pontiac CC Administration et al
as 1:2023cv05257
Plaintiff:
Craig Williams and Kathyleen A. Monrose
Defendant:
Pontiac CC Administration, Rob Jeffrey, Warden Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapter 4 Corp. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv04808
Plaintiff:
Chapter 4 Corp.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Fujian Youheng Tourism Service Co., Ltd., Yiwu Chuangshen Bags Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04774
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Central States Se & Sw Areas Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Ramos et al
as 1:2017cv01114
Plaintiff:
Central States Se & Sw Areas Health & Welfare Fund and Arthur H. Bunte, Jr.
Defendant:
Sabrina Ramos, Joshua T. Howle and Wigger Law Firm, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Boyles v. Haynes et al
as 4:2011cv04080
Plaintiff:
Gary Boyles
Defendant:
Steve Haynes, Thereasa Thompson and Troy Howl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
