Cases 21 - 30 of 107
Smith v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv05417
Defendant:
City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1 through 50
Plaintiff:
Hugh Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv04851
Defendant:
City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Hugh Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller et al v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2012cv04466
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health, Inc., County of Nassau, Nursing Administrator Hailey and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Colon, Tyron Maynor, Daniel Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv03303
Plaintiff:
Hugh Smith
Defendant:
City of New York, Commissioner Doro B. Schriro, Mayor Michael Bloomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cameron et al
as 1:2011cv04049
Plaintiff:
Hugh Smith
Defendant:
Cameron, Correction Officer John Doe, Correction Officer John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony Goodman v. Commissioner, Georgia Departme, et al
as 11-11752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY GOODMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HUGH SMITH, Warden of the Georgia State Prison, RONALD WHITAKER, Deputy Warden for Care and Treatment of the Augusta State Medical Prison and others
Dexter Palmer v. Warden, Georgia SP
as 11-11513
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEXTER RAMONE PALMER
Respondent - Appellee:
HUGH SMITH, Warden
Sims v. Smith
as 1:2011cv00570
Petitioner:
Darrell Sims
Respondent:
Hugh Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boatwright v. Washington et al
as 5:2011cv00054
Plaintiff:
Mark Otis Boatwright
Defendant:
Anthony Washington, Hugh Smith, Steve Upton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Smith
as 2:2010cv00184
Petitioner:
Michael E. Robertson
Respondent:
Hugh Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
