Cases 1 - 10 of 798
Hughes v. Captain Gipson et al
as 9:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Charles Harold Hughes
Defendant:
Captain Gibson, Sgt Sykes and Office of the Attorney General - Amicus Curiae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01897
Petitioner:
Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hancock v. Fuller
as 4:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Hancock
Defendant:
Hugh Alexander Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Mark Lyle Bell
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Kamilah Coger, Joy Hughes, Todd Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Truist Bank v. Hughes et al
as 4:2024cv01638
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank
Defendant:
Gerald Hughes, Beckie Hughes and The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bourne et al v. Liker et al
as 1:2024cv00465
Defendant:
Bridgette K Losey, Kelly Suzanne Liker, Ascension Health doing business as Dell Children's Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Lorina Bourne and Jason Troy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shannonhouse v. Fay Servicing, LLC
as 4:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Hugh Shannonhouse
Defendant:
Fay Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Reese v. Martinez et al
as 6:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Reese
Defendant:
Annette Martinez, Jodi Sawyer, T. Matz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. ALDI (Texas) LLC
as 3:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Tonya Hughes
Defendant:
ALDI (Texas) LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
