Cases 1 - 10 of 199
Hughes v. Crews et al
as 4:2024cv00081
Defendant:
Royce Hunt, Cookie Crews and Sarah Thomas
Plaintiff:
Valdeze Merthone Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. SSA
as 0:2024cv00079
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Plaintiff:
Dusty Lee Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Select Rehabilitation, LLC v. Hughes Health & Rehabilitation, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Select Rehabilitation, LLC
Defendant:
Hughes Health & Rehabilitation, Inc. doing business as Hughes Health & Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hughes v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hughes, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hughes v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Clifford Hughes
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brown v. Hughes
as 3:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Kenneth W. Brown
Respondent:
Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Hughes
as 2:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Michael Ernest Moore
Respondent:
Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sharp v. The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Sharp, Jr.
Defendant:
The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department, Stephen Irwin and Joshua Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
