Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00330
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Humphries v. Wilson
as 1:2016cv00093
Petitioner:
William David Humphries
Respondent:
Eric Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilkerson v. County of Chesterfield et al
as 2:2015cv00531
Plaintiff:
Norman Kevin Wilkerson
Defendant:
County of Chesterfield, Chesterfield Police Department, Chesterfield County Commonwealth Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humphries v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00188
Plaintiff:
Bernard Wade Humphries
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Humphries et al v. Elite Force Staffing, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Robert Humphries , Jeffrey Liu and Kevin O'Hara
Defendant:
Elite Force Staffing, Inc. and Steven W. Worrell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Humphries v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2012cv01402
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Humphries
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aspen American Insurance Company v. Craft et al
as 7:2012cv00408
Plaintiff:
Aspen American Insurance Company
Defendant:
David G. Craft, LUTCF Gerald W. Craft, Myrtle J. Craft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
William v. Newhart et al
as 2:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome William
Defendant:
John R. Newhart, Ms. Christopher, Mr. Hercules and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
