Cases 1 - 10 of 26
DOE v. CRISTINI et al
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
R. CRISTINI and E. HURD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NARANJO v. COULEHAN et al
as 2:2023cv01983
Plaintiff:
ISAAC NARANJO
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER COULEHAN, HURD, WITTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv01780
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JONES and SHAMEL JONES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, GEORGE LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hurd v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv01206
Plaintiff:
Nanette Hurd
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
SANDERS v. COULEHAN et al
as 2:2023cv00737
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI SANDERS
Defendant:
D. COULEHAN, E. HURD, CO. D. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROTEN v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
ISIAH ANDREW ROTEN
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, TABB BICKELL, MICHAEL ZAKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HURD v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv01729
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, DR. STEPHEN WIENER, DR. DESANTIS and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT MICHAEL HURD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIPIETRO v. PHILADELPHIA ORGANIZED CRIME OFFICE (FBI) et al
as 3:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
NICODEMO DIPIETRO
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA ORGANIZED CRIME OFFICE (FBI), DARREN WORKMIESTER, DAVID M. HARDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HURD v. POLEY et al
as 2:2016cv00924
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HURD
Defendant:
MICHAEL POLEY and SERVICE TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
