Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Friedman v. SThree Plc.
as 19-3863
Defendant / Appellee:
SThree Holdings B.V., Specialty Staffing Solutions, Inc., Malcolm Stevens, AKA Billie and others
Defendant:
Palint Foundation B.V., Huxley Associates Inc., Bill Stevens and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dan Friedman
Friedman v. SThree Plc.
as 19-3258
Defendant / Appellee:
Huxley Associates B.V., SThree Inc., Nikolay Tischchenko and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dan Friedman
Defendant:
Bill Stevens
Burns v. Cambridge, Huxley & Associates
as 1:2017mc00030
Plaintiff:
Regenia Campbell Burns
Defendant:
Cambridge, Huxley & Associates
Friedman v. SThree Plc. et al
as 3:2014cv00378
Plaintiff:
Dan Friedman
Defendant:
SThree Plc., SThree Inc., Huxley Associates Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gordon v. Cambridge Huxley & Associates, LLC
as 1:2012cv02628
Defendant:
Cambridge Huxley & Associates, LLC
Plaintiff:
Karen Gordon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mihovic v. Cambridge, Huxley & Associates, LLC
as 1:2012mc00028
Plaintiff:
Mary Mihovic
Defendant:
Cambridge, Huxley & Associates, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mihovic et al v. Cambridge Huxley & Associates, LLC
as 1:2009cv09584
Plaintiff:
Mary Mihovic and Mary Mihovic
Defendant:
Cambridge Huxley & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Johnson v. Cambridge Huxley & Associates, LLC et al
as 0:2009cv01715
Plaintiff:
Chad Johnson
Defendant:
Cambridge Huxley & Associates, LLC, Phyllis Jackson, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Torts - Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
