Cases 21 - 30 of 212
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01201
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00868
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
as 2:2020cv02363
Plaintiff:
Farmworker Legal Aid Clinic and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00704
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00604
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00502
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02058
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RODRIGUEZ v. DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 3:2019cv00119
Respondent:
DIRECTOR MATHEW ALBENCE, DIRECTOR HUGH J. HURWITZ, SECRETARY KEVIN MCALEENAN and others
Petitioner:
LEONARDO LLERAS RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pratt v. Department of Justice (DOJ) et al
as 3:2019cv00290
Plaintiff:
Henry Pratt
Defendant:
Homeland Security (DHS), United States Government (USG), Warden Clair Doll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gonzalez v. Doe # 1 et al
as 3:2018cv02254
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Richard Roe # 1, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
