Cases 1 - 10 of 979
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01573
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
McManamon et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
as 3:2023cv02069
Plaintiff:
Theresa McManamon and Donald McManamon
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. d/b/a Walmart Supercenter Store 1623, Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart, Inc., Wal-Mart Incoporated, Wal-Mart Stores, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Store 1623, Wal-Mart Supercenter, Wal-Mart SuperCenter Store 1623, Walmart, Inc., Walmart Inco and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
THE UFCW LOCAL 152 RETAIL MEAT PENSION FUND et al v. VIN-INCO ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv04128
Plaintiff:
UFCW LOCAL 152 RETAIL MEAT PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE UFCW LOCAL 152 RETAIL MEAT PENSION FUND and THE UFCW LOCAL 152 RETAIL MEAT PENSION FUND
Defendant:
VIN-INCO ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A INCOLLINGO'S IGA, INCOLLINGO'S ASSOCIATES INC. D/B/A INKY'S DISCOUNT LIQUORS, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
TRUSTEES OF THE UFCW LOCAL 152 RETAIL MEAT PENSION FUND v. VIN-INCO ENTERPRISES, INC.
as 1:2022cv01873
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE UFCW LOCAL 152 RETAIL MEAT PENSION FUND
Defendant:
VIN-INCO ENTERPRISES, INC. a/k/a INCOLLINGOS MARKET, VIN-INCO ENTERPRISES, INC. and INCOLLINGO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TRUSTEES OF THE UFCW LOCAL 152 RETAIL MEAT PENSION FUND et al v. VIN-INCO ENTERPRISES, INC.
as 1:2021cv13004
Defendant:
VIN-INCO ENTERPRISES, INC., INCOLLINGOS MARKET and INCOLLINGO
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE UFCW LOCAL 152 RETAIL MEAT PENSION FUND, THE UFCW LOCAL 152 SAVINGS PLAN and TRUSTEES OF THE UFCW LOCAL 152 SAVINGS PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ABC Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2020cv02363
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", shenzhenchaoliufeng, fthj5 and others
Plaintiff:
ABC Corporation and PopSockets LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
VIRIDIAN RESOURCES, L.L.C. v. INCO LIMITED
as 2:2018cv15021
Plaintiff:
VIRIDIAN RESOURCES, L.L.C.
Defendant:
INCO LIMITED, N/K/A VALE CANADA LIMITED and INCO LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gregory Brown v. Albert Bossier, Jr., et al
as 18-30730
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREGORY BROWN
Defendant - Appellant:
ALBERT J. BOSSIER, JR., J. MELTON GARRETT, HUNTINGTON INGALLS, INCORPORATED, formerly known as Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Incorporated, formerly known as Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Incorporated, formerly known as Avondale Industries, Incorporated, formerly known as Avondale Shipyards, Inco and others
Sandra Melancon, et al v. Lamorak Insurance Company, et al
as 18-30113
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SANDRA VICKNAIR MELANCON and LYNN M. MELANCON
Defendant - Appellant:
LAMORAK INSURANCE COMPANY, as successor in interest to the liability for policies of insurance Commercial Union Insurance Company,Employers Commercial Union Insurance Company, and American Employers Insurance Company issued by, HUNTINGTON INGALLS, INCORPORATED, formerly known as Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Incorporated, formerly known as Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Incorporated, formerly known as Avondale Industries, Incorporated, formerly known as Avondale Shipyards, Inco, ALBERT BOSSIER, JR. and others
George Mayeaux, Jr. v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., et al
as 17-30668
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEORGE K. MAYEAUX, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
HUNTINGTON INGALLS, INCORPORATED, formerly known as Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Incorporated, formerly known as Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Incorporated, formerly known as Avondale Industries, Incorporated, formerly known as Avondale Shipyards, Inco and ONEBEACON AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, now known as Lamorak Insurance Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
