Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
THOMPSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00113
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL THOMPSON
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN, ERIC BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INDIANA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS
as 2:2013cv01796
Plaintiff:
INDIANA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Adirondack Medical Center, et al v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 12-5366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Adirondack Medical Center, Alice Hyde Medical Center, Ashtabula County Medical Center and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Corning Hospital, Sid Peterson Memorial Hospital, doing business as Peterson Regional Medical Center and Via Christi Hospital Pittsburg, Inc., doing business as Mt. Carmel Regional Medical Center, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv01671
Plaintiff:
ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER , ALICE HYDE MEDICAL CENTER , ASHTABULA COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ARMSTRONG COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv00565
Plaintiff:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL-NORTH MISSISSIPPI, INC. , BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
