Cases 11 - 20 of 131
Carden et al v. ING Bank, FSB et al
as 9:2013cv80659
Plaintiff:
G. Alexander Carden and Stephanie B. Carden
Defendant:
ING Bank, FSB , ING Direct , Capital One, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Richman v. ING Bank, FSB et al
as 3:2013cv01132
Plaintiff:
Joshua Richman
Defendant:
ING Bank, FSB and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lonnie G Schmidt v. ING Bank FSB et al
as 8:2013cv00600
Defendant:
Does, ING Bank FSB and Integrated Lender Services
Plaintiff:
Lonnie G Schmidt
Mansoori, et al v. ING Bank, FSB
as 2:2013cv11583
Defendant:
ING Bank, FSB
Plaintiff:
Shahrokh Mansoori and Masoumeh Mansoori
Sliptchuik v. ING Bank, FSB et al
as 6:2013cv00460
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Sliptchuik
Defendant:
ING Bank, FSB and Any And All Unknown Parties Claiming By, Through, Under, And Against The Herein Named Individual Defendant(s) Who Are Not Known To Be Dead Or Alive, Whether Said Unknown Parties May Claim An Interest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Foreclosure
Young v. ING Bank FSB
as 2:2013cv00420
Plaintiff:
Tracy Young
Defendant:
ING Bank FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00365
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Frausto v. ING Bank, FSB et al
as 3:2013cv00058
Plaintiff:
Beatriz Frausto
Defendant:
ING Bank, FSB , Integrated Lender Services and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Gerbitz v. ING Bank fsb
as 1:2012cv01670
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Gerbitz
Defendant:
ING Bank fsb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Johnathan Yarger v. ING Bank fsb
as 12-8106
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
JOHNATHAN YARGER and TRUDE YARGER, a married couple
Defendant - Respondent:
ING BANK FSB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
