Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Live Nation Entertainment Inc v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Live Nation Entertainment Inc
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company afent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Inc. v. Hartford Healthcare Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv15002
Plaintiff:
Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Hartford Healthcare Corporation, Hartford Hospital, Hartford Healthcare Medical Group, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Press Ganey Associates, LLC
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center v. Hartford HealthCare Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center and Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center, INC
Defendant:
Hartford HealthCare Corporation, Hartford Hospital, Hartford Healthcare Medical Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Alaska Air Group Inc et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
Albertsons Companies Inc Health and Welfare Plan, Walgreen Health and Welfare Plan (Plan No 501), Alaska Air Group Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc, Aware Integrated Inc and BCBSM Inc d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota (together "Aware"), Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barbeque Integrated, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03454
Defendant:
Simmons Prepared Foods, Inc., Harrison Poultry, Inc., Agri Stats, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Barbeque Integrated, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Integrity Financial Services of Tampa Bay Inc. et al v. NHK Spring Co. Ltd. et al
as 3:2019cv07046
Defendant:
NHK Spring (Thailand) Co., Ltd., SAE Magnetics (H.K.) Ltd., NAT Peripheral (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Cowden Associates, Inc., Integrity Financial Services of Tampa Bay Inc. and Integrity Financial Services of Tampa Bay Inc. d/b/a Integrity Financial Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
