Cases 1 - 7 of 7
OOO PTICEFABRIKA AKASHEVSKAYA v. INTERLINK GROUP CORPORATION USA (U.S.A.)
as 2:2016cv03210
Plaintiff:
OOO PTICEFABRIKA AKASHEVSKAYA
Defendant:
INTERLINK GROUP CORPORATION USA (U.S.A.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Interlink Group Corporation U.S.A., Inc. v. Worldwide Cargo Logistics, Inc.
as 1:2015cv23064
Plaintiff:
Interlink Group Corporation U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Worldwide Cargo Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Interlink Group Corporation US v. American Trade and Financial C
as 15-1536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INTERLINK GROUP CORPORATION USA, INC
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN TRADE AND FINANCIAL CORPORATION and ANATOLI TIMOKHINE
Third Party - Appellee:
ALEXANDER KARPMAN
Interlink Group Corporation USA, Inc. v. American Trade and Financial Corporation
as 6:2013mc00006
Plaintiff:
Interlink Group Corporation USA, Inc.
Defendant:
American Trade and Financial Corporation
Counter_claimant:
American Trade and Financial Corporation
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
American Trade and Financial Corporation
Thirdparty_defendant:
Anatoli Timokhine
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
INTERLINK GROUP CORPORATION USA, INC. v. AMERICAN TRADE AND FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv06179
Plaintiff:
INTERLINK GROUP CORPORATION USA, INC.
Defendant:
AMERICAN TRADE AND FINANCIAL CORPORATION and ANATOLI TIMOKHINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
INTERLINK GROUP CORPORATION v. CWT FARMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 1:2009cv02109
Plaintiff:
INTERLINK GROUP CORPORATION and INTERLINK GROUP CORPORATION
Defendant:
CWT Farms International, Inc., CWT Farms International, Inc. and CWT Farms International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Type:
Other Statutes
INTERLINK GROUP CORPORATION v. CWT FARMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 2:2009cv03049
Plaintiff:
INTERLINK GROUP CORPORATION
Defendant:
CWT FARMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
