Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00924
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
TOURE v. AUTO EQUITY LOANS OF DE, LLC, ET AL.
as 2:2021cv03716
Plaintiff:
IBRAHIMA SORY TOURE
Defendant:
auto equity loans of DE llc and INTERNATIONAL RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
CARR v. BEST BUY MOTORS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01752
Plaintiff:
CODIE CARR
Defendant:
BEST BUY MOTORS, INC. , INTERNATIONAL RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BRANCH v. CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv07157
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE BRANCH
Defendant:
CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICE, INC., AVANGARD CAPITAL GROUP, INC., SIMON FRIEDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dostal et al v. International Recovery Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01742
Plaintiff:
Jiri Dostal , Ana Sanchez and Maria Sanchez
Defendant:
International Recovery Systems, Inc. and Christo, Armstrong, Powers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
