Cases 1 - 10 of 586
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 148 et al v. Franklin County, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 148, Chad Alfermann, Austin Anderson and others
Defendant:
Franklin County, Missouri, Tim Brinker, Todd Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union v. Magnitude 7 Metals, LLC.
as 4:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry. Rubber, Manufacturing, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
Defendant:
Magnitude 7 Metals, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union v. Magnitude 7 Metals, LLC.
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
Defendant:
Magnitude 7 Metals, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Human v. International Union of Police Associations AFL (CIO) et al
as 4:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Daniel Human
Defendant:
International Union of Police Associations AFL (CIO), International Union of Police Associations doing business as National Police and Troopers Association and Jone Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. Diestelkamp Contracting, LLC
as 4:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis and others
Defendant:
Diestelkamp Contracting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. JC's Diamond Shine Cleaning Services, LLC
as 4:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis and others
Defendant:
JC's Diamon Shine Cleaning Services, LLC and JC's Diamond Shine Cleaning Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. Alpha & Omega, The Beginning and End Demolition Co., LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis and others
Defendant:
Alpha & Omega, The Beginning and End Demolition Co., LLC and Daniel Wallace doing business as Alpha & Omega, The Beginning and End Demolition Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. MC Masonry and Restoration, LLC
as 4:2023cv01438
Plaintiff:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees of the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis and others
Defendant:
MC Masonry and Restoration, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Local 513, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO et al v. R & K Excavation, Inc.
as 4:2023cv01354
Plaintiff:
Local 513, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, Brian Graff, Local Union 513 Health and Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
R & K Excavation, Inc. and James T Callahan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
