Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Sony Music Entertainment v. Cox Communications, Incorporated
as 21-1168
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMI FEIST CATALOG INC., ROADRUNNER RECORDS, INC., FUELED BY RAMEN LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
COXCOM, LLC and COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., W.B.M. MUSIC CORP. and others
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES, CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY AND TECHNOLOGY, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PROFESSORS and others
Elsevier Inc. et al v. Sci-Hub et al
as 1:2015cv04282
Plaintiff:
Elsevier Inc. , Elsevier B.V. and Elsevier Ltd.
Defendant:
Sci-Hub, The Library Genesis Project, Alexandra Elbakyan and others
Amicu:
Computer & Communications Industry Association and Internet Commerce Coalition
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Google Inc. v. Hood
as 3:2014cv00981
Plaintiff:
Google Inc.
Defendant:
Jim Hood, Digital Citizens Alliance, Taylor Hooton Foundation and others
Interested Party:
Gina Morris
Amicus Curiae:
International AntiCounterfeiting Coalition, Attorney General Jack Conway, Electronic Frontier Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe v. Myspace Inc, et al
as 07-50345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANE DOE, Individually and as next friend of Julie Doe, a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
MYSPACE INC and NEWS CORP
Amicus Curiae:
INTERNET COMMERCE COALITION, UNITED STATES INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER ASSOCIATION, COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION and others
Chicago Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Inc. v. Craigslist, Inc.
as 1:2006cv00657
Plaintiff:
Chicago Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Inc., Chicago Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Inc., Chicago Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Craigslist, Inc. and Craigslist, Inc.
Amicu:
Amazon.Com, Inc., Amazon.Com, Inc., AOL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
