Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Johnson v. Gagne
as 26-1044
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOHNSON
Defendant:
GERARD G. GAGNE, Psychiatrist, THOMAS KOCIENDA, Chief Psychologist, LALITHA PIERI, Supervisory Psychologist and others
Johnson v. Gagne
as 26-615
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOHNSON
Defendant:
GERARD G. GAGNE, Psychiatrist, THOMAS KOCIENDA, Chief Psychologist, LALITHA PIERI, Supervisory Psychologist and others
Tucker v. Gordelis
as 25-52
Defendant:
MCCRAY, BRANDON BROMLEY, GORDELIS and others
Plaintiff:
DEAVEN TUCKER
Sosa v. Sweet
as 23-536
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andres R. Sosa
Defendant / Appellee:
Craig Burns, Psychiatric MD, PhD., Robert Berger, Psychiatric MD, PhD., Andrea C. Reischerl, PMHCNS-BC Pyschiatric APRN and others
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Christopher Sweet, Correctional Officer David Evans, Correctional Officer L'T Brian Stadalnik and others
Johnson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sosa v. Sweet
as 22-526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andres R. Sosa
Defendant / Appellee:
Craig Burns, Psychiatric MD, PhD., Robert Berger, Psychiatric MD, PhD. and Christina Carole Wright, PSY-APRN
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Christopher Sweet, Correctional Officer David Evans, Correctional Officer L'T Brian Stadalnik and others
Tucker v. Gordelis
as 21-550
Defendant / Appellee:
Muckle, Sweatman, Blekis and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Deavon Tucker
Davidson v. Fitzgerald et al
as 3:2021cv00063
Plaintiff:
Benjamin A. Davidson
Defendant:
Monica Rinaldi, Robert Martin, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Gordelis et al
as 3:2020cv01810
Defendant:
Martin, Gordelis, McCray and others
Plaintiff:
Deavon Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tressa v. CR Bard et al
as 2:2020cv05419
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Iozzia Tressa and Tressa Iozzia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
