Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MONCUS v. LASALLE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC D/B/A LASALLE CORRECTIONS et al
as 7:2019cv00075
Defendant:
LASALLE SOUTHEAST LLC, DONNIE YOUGHN, IRWIN COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER MONCUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IRWIN COUNTY GEORGIA v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 7:2018cv00041
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, PURDUE PHARMA LP and others
Plaintiff:
IRWIN COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROUNTREE v. IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 7:2016cv00147
Plaintiff:
ERIC PRESTON ROUNTREE
Defendant:
IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, IRWIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DONNIE YAUGHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMSON v. LASALLE CORRECTIONS et al
as 7:2016cv00133
Plaintiff:
CHAD ALLEN WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
LASALLE CORRECTIONS, IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, IRWIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENSON v. LASALLE CORRECTIONS et al
as 7:2016cv00134
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CHALYSE BENSON
Defendant:
LASALLE CORRECTIONS, IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, IRWIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickey v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
Sherman Dickey
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, CRISP COUNTY GEORGIA, JONES COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickey v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 7:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
Sherman Dickey
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, CRISP COUNTY GEORGIA, JONES COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GEORGIA et al
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, THE GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, HANCOCK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and others
Movant:
BYRON PEACH CHARTER SCHOOL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
