Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Lovelo v. Clermont County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mark Lovelo and Mark Lovell
Defendant:
Clermont County Sheriff's Office, Clermont County, Ohio, Sheriff Robert Leahy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Levine v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04326
Plaintiff:
Irwin Levine
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Irwin v. Luby
as 1:2022cv02041
Plaintiff:
James W. Irwin
Defendant:
Donna B. Luby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Luby v. Irwin
as 1:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Donna B. Luby
Defendant:
James W. Irwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Irwin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05599
Plaintiff:
Lori Irwin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
B&T Express Inc. v. Continental Casualty Company et al
as 4:2021cv01744
Plaintiff:
B&T Express Inc.
Defendant:
Continental Casualty Company doing business as CNA Insurance Co., Acrisure, LLC doing business as Frates Irwin Risk Management Solutions, Wellco Tank Trucks Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dae Sung Hi Tech Co., Ltd. et al v. D&B Sales, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01448
Plaintiff:
Dae Sung Hi Tech Co., Ltd. and First 2 Market Products, LLC
Defendant:
D&B Sales, Inc., Dale Irwin and Bobbi Irwin
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Irwin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03355
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lynnette Irwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Karon et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01613
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY KARON and IRWIN KARON
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Irwin et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00910
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Irwin and Matthew Irwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
