Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Howard v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Norris B Howard, Sr
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Jimmy Hudson, Joseph Gorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Hudson, Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Hudson, Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Iverson et al
as 4:2022cv01120
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Iverson and Elkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. Iverson et al
as 4:2022cv00818
Plaintiff:
Percy Little, Jr
Defendant:
Iverson, Darrell Elkins, Joseph Gorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Gorman et al
as 4:2022cv00547
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Frazier
Defendant:
Gorman, Baker, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Elkin et al
as 4:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Frazier
Defendant:
Darrell Elkin, Denise Johnson, Iverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Doe
as 4:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Frazier
Defendant:
Doe, Does 1-4, Doctor, Linda, Cook, Cheryl, Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beard v. Adams et al
as 4:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Francisco Beard
Defendant:
Adams, Baker, Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iverson v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv04026
Plaintiff:
Deandre Iverson
Defendant:
Schneider National Carriers, Inc. and Kenyan Head
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
