Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WILLIAMS v. CORNELL CAPITAL LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04706
Plaintiff:
KRISSY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CORNELL CAPITAL LLC, INSTANT BRANDS, INC. f/k/a DOUBLE INSIGHT INC., d/b/a INSTANT POT COMPANY, INSTANT BRANDS LLC, d/b/a INSTANT POT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andrychowska-Klosek v. K.K. et al
as 3:2022cv01897
Plaintiff:
Marta Andrychowska-Klosek and K.K.
Defendant:
Instant Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PATTON v. INSTANT BRANDS, INC.
as 5:2022cv04644
Plaintiff:
AMANDA PATTON
Defendant:
INSTANT BRANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SPADA v. INSTANT BRANDS, LLC
as 2:2022cv01425
Plaintiff:
DEREK SPADA, CORELLE BRANDS, LLC and WORLD KITCHEN, LLC
Defendant:
INSTANT BRANDS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
DURHAM v. INSTANT BRANDS, INC.
as 2:2021cv05417
Plaintiff:
AMBER DURHAM
Defendant:
INSTANT BRANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUMMINGS v. INSTANT BRANDS INC.
as 3:2021cv00202
Plaintiff:
MOLLY CUMMINGS
Defendant:
INSTANT BRANDS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
N.G. et al v. INSTANT BRANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00754
Plaintiff:
N.G., BRITTANY GONZALEZ and O.C. a minor
Defendant:
INSTANT BRANDS, INC. and TARGET CORPORATION doing business as TARGET STORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STAYROOK v. INSTANT BRANDS
as 3:2020cv00249
Plaintiff:
SUSAN STAYROOK
Defendant:
INSTANT BRANDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIVE FACE ON WEB, LLC v. THE CONTROL GROUP MEDIA COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01306
Plaintiff:
LIVE FACE ON WEB, LLC
Defendant:
THE CONTROL GROUP MEDIA COMPANY, INC. and INSTANT CHECKMATE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
