Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dick Smith Nissan, Inc. et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01237
Plaintiff:
Dick Smith Nissan, Inc. and Dick Smith Infiniti, Inc.
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Seagers v. AMIKIDS, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv03434
Plaintiff:
Shadeana Seagers
Defendant:
AMIKIDS, Inc. , AMIKIDS Behavioral Health, Inc. , AMIKIDS Foundation, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice
Counter_defendant:
AMIKIDS Sand Hills, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
J&J Sports Productions Inc v. Infiniti of Rock Hill Corp et al
as 0:2014cv01745
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Infiniti of Rock Hill Corp, Michelle Judge, Ebony Monique McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
United States of America v. 399619 dollars in US Currency et al
as 2:2011mc00055
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
399619 dollars in US Currency and Infiniti G35 2008 VIN JNKBV61EX8M227495
Claimant:
Doa Ping Lin and Jin Xian Yang
Hanks et al v. Infinity Business Group Inc
as 3:2010cv00720
Plaintiff:
William Hanks and Debra Hanks
Defendant:
Infinity Business Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Danielson v. Infinity Business Group Inc
as 2:2010cv00268
Plaintiff:
William E Danielson
Defendant:
Infinity Business Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Starks v. Infinity Insurance Company
as 2:2009cv00564
Plaintiff:
Charles Roy Starks
Defendant:
Infinity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
