Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Interlake Mecalux, Inc. v. Distribution Property Solutions
as 1:2020cv03152
Plaintiff:
Interlake Mecalux, Inc.
Defendant:
Distribution Property Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Todd v. Interlake Mecalux, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00749
Defendant:
Interlake Mecalux, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James L. Todd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01455
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OSF Healthcare System, an Illinois not for profit corporation d/b/a SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER v. United Healthcare Insurance Co. et al
as 1:2014cv01470
Plaintiff:
OSF Healthcare System, an Illinois not for profit corporation d/b/a SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
United Healthcare Insurance Co. and Interlake Mecalux, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Spillers v. Interlake Mecalux Inc
as 8:2013cv03588
Plaintiff:
Christopher Spillers
Defendant:
Interlake Mecalux Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Interlake Mecalux, Inc. v. Summit Steel & Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01610
Plaintiff:
Interlake Mecalux, Inc.
Defendant:
Summit Steel & Manufacturing, Inc., Adam L. Witman, Bob Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
