Cases 21 - 30 of 8,940
Robert Wright, III v. Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service
as 24-11202
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Kulick v. United States Internal Revenue Service, et al.
as 24-2462
Plaintiff:
R. J. KULICK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and DOES, 1-100, Inclusive
Montero v. CIR
as 24-60190
Petitioner:
Adolfo Sandor Montero
Respondent:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Fitzgerald v. Department of Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline L. Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Department of Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Fitzgerald v. Department of Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline L. Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Department of Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Fitzgerald v. Department of Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline L. Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Department of Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Goodwin v. CIR
as 24-9003
Petitioner:
JENNIFER D. GOODWIN
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2024cv01070
Plaintiff:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Roman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-2220
Petitioner:
LUMINITA ROMAN
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Gray v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2024cv02621
Plaintiff:
Dunstan R. Gray
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
