Cases 31 - 40 of 133
Hummel et al v. United States et al
as 2:2019cv03726
Plaintiff:
Terry Hummel, Gail Hummel, Terry V. Hummel and others
Defendant:
Attorney Office United States, Internal Revenue Service and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Internal Revenue Service v. Rahman et al
as 1:2019cv00145
Plaintiff:
Internal Revenue Service
Defendant:
Shakil S Rahman and Nahree Rahman
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
MIMB Investments LLC v. Merklin et al
as 2:2018cv01502
Defendant:
PNC Mortgage, Delaware County Treasurer, National City Mortgage Co. and others
Plaintiff:
MIMB Investments LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Johnson v. Department of Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2018cv00185
Plaintiff:
Gayle A. Johnson
Defendant:
Department of Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
LendingHome Funding Corp. v. Provost et al
as 3:2018cv00114
Defendant:
Michael Provost, Something Something Construction Group LP, City of Toledo and others
Plaintiff:
LendingHome Funding Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Internal Revenue Service v. Evans
as 2:2017mc00022
Plaintiff:
Internal Revenue Service
Defendant:
Robert Evans
Houston v. U.S. Federal Aids et al
as 1:2017cv00712
Plaintiff:
Stanley Houston
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Aids and Internal Revenue Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shirk v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
Teri Jo Shirk
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Midwest Intermediaries v. Internal Revenue Service Department of Treasury
as 2:2016cv01054
Plaintiff:
Midwest Intermediaries
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
