Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Hamilton v. International House of Pancakes, LLC et al
as 6:2018cv00284
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hamilton
Defendant:
International House of Pancakes, LLC , Sunshine Restaurant Merger Sub, LLC and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Canela v. International House of Pancakes, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv07426
Plaintiff:
Erasmo Canela
Defendant:
International House of Pancakes, LLC, Trihop 177th Street, LLC and Trihop Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv23773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Azhar Chaudhry, et al v. International House of Pancake
as 15-2910
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AZHAR CHAUDHRY, an individual, ARS RESTAURANT, INC., an Illinois Corporation and LUCKY STAR NO. 5409, INC., an Illinois Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Tangas v. International House of Pancakes LLC
as 3:2015cv01566
Plaintiff:
Autumn Lee Tangas
Defendant:
International House of Pancakes LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
