Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,096
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Bryan Pringle v. William Adams, Jr., et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-55998
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRYAN PRINGLE, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, STACY FERGUSON, individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Simmons v. Stanberry et al
as 12-1665
Plaintiff - Appellant: Tyrone Simmons
Defendant - Appellee: William C. Stanberry, Jr., AKA Apex, Curtis Jackson, AKA 50 cent, Universal Music Group and others
Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al
as 12-55000
Plaintiff - Appellee: EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom and MANFRED MOHR, an individual
Defendant - Appellant: WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, ALLAN PINEDA, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Defendant: STACY FERGUSON, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, UMG RECORDINGS, INC., INTERSCOPE RECORDS and others
Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al
as 11-57230
Plaintiff - Appellee: EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom and MANFRED MOHR, an individual
Defendant: WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, ALLAN PINEDA, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Defendant - Appellant: STACY FERGUSON, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, EMI APRIL MUSIC, INC. and HEADPHONE JUNKIE PUBLISHING, LLC
Kenneth Blue v. William James Adams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv09202
Defendant: William James Adams, Jr, Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff: Kenneth Blue
Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al Featured Case
as 11-56921
Plaintiff - Appellant: EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom and MANFRED MOHR, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, ALLAN PINEDA, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Shadrach Winstead v. Curtis Jackson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3771
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHADRACH WINSTEAD
Defendant - Appellee: CURTIS JACKSON, a/k/a FIFTY CENT, INTERSCOPE RECORDS, INC., UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP and others
Jammie Thomas-Rasset v. United State
as 11-3043
Plaintiff: Capitol Records, Inc., Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Arista Records LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee: Jammie Thomas-Rasset
Intervenor Below - Appellant: United States of America
Capitol Records, Inc., et al v. Jammie Thomas-Rasset We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2858
Plaintiff - Appellee: Capitol Records, Inc., Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Arista Records LLC and others
Defendant - Appellant: Jammie Thomas-Rasset
Intervenor Below: United States of America
Capitol Records, Inc., et al v. Jammie Thomas-Rasset We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2820
Plaintiff - Appellant: Capitol Records, Inc., Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Arista Records LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee: Jammie Thomas-Rasset
Intervenor Below - Appellee: United States of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?