Cases 1 - 8 of 8
McWilliams v. Sandy et al
as 5:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Michael P. McWilliams
Defendant:
Paul A. Sandy, David Guerrera, Cortland City Police Department - Criminal Investigation Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antoine v. Larotonda et al
as 1:2016cv06056
Plaintiff:
Robert Antoine
Defendant:
Investigator Michael Larotonda, The County of Westchester , Janet DiFiore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv07252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Alli v. Security Officer Pedlar et al
as 1:2014cv10257
Plaintiff:
Umar Alli
Defendant:
Security Officer Pedlar, Security Officer Bravo, Security Officer Almazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gutierrez v. IRP/Investigations Division Institutional Hearing Program, NY District et al
as 1:2008cv06783
Plaintiff:
Javier Gutierrez
Defendant:
IRP/Investigations Division Institutional Hearing Program, NY District and IRP/Investigations Division Institutional Hearing Program, NY District
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clarke v. The People of the State of New York et al
as 9:2008cv00459
Plaintiff:
Franklyn Anthony Clarke
Defendant:
The People of the State of New York, IRP/Investigations Division and The Institutional Hearing Program
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clarke v. The People of the State of New York et al
as 1:2008cv01673
Plaintiff:
Franklyn Anthony Clarke
Defendant:
The People of the State of New York, IRP/Investigations Division and The Institutional Hearing Program
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gutierrez v. IRP/Investigations Division Institutional Hearing Program New York District
as 1:2008cv00840
Plaintiff:
Javier Gutierrez
Defendant:
IRP/Investigations Division Institutional Hearing Program New York District
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
