Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mohammad v. International Business Machines Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv12910
Plaintiff:
Khalid Mohammad
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation, Progress Software Corporation and Ipswitch, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Blades v. Financial Institution Service Corp et al
as 1:2023cv12859
Plaintiff:
Jerry Blades
Defendant:
Financial Institution Service Corp, Homeland Bancshares Inc, Progress Software Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kent v. Pathward, N.A. et al
as 1:2023cv12764
Plaintiff:
Jacob Kent
Defendant:
Pathward, N.A., IPSWITCH, INC. and Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
MACGILLIVRAY et al v. NATIONAL ACCOUNT SERVICE COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv12720
Plaintiff:
LISA MACGILLIVRAY and DANIEL MACGILLIVRAY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
NATIONAL ACCOUNT SERVICE COMPANY, LLC, BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC., PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Kent v. Pathward, N.A. et al
as 4:2023cv04177
Plaintiff:
Jacob Kent
Defendant:
Pathward, N.A., Ipswitch, Inc and Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Blades v. Financial Institution Service Corp et al
as 3:2023cv01471
Plaintiff:
Jerry Blades
Defendant:
Financial Institution Service Corp, Homeland Bancshares Inc, Progress Software Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ghalem et al v. Progress Software Company et al
as 1:2023cv12300
Plaintiff:
Hadj Ghalem and Martin Foth Willmann
Defendant:
Progress Software Company, Ipswitch, Inc. and UMass Chan Medical School
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
