Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ezekiel Cox v. Dr. Iqbal
as 23-7131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL J. COX
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. IQBAL, LARRY EDMONDS, Warden, BOWELS, Assistant Warden and others
Ezekiel Cox v. Dr. Nwaokoha
as 23-6858
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL J. COX
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. NWAOKOHA, LARRY EDMONDS, Warden, BOWELS, Assistant Warden and others
Aprillia v. The Boeing Company
as 1:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
Tania Aprillia, Kevin Sungiardi, Jesen Sungiardi and others
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In Re: Air Crash into the Java Sea on January 9, 2021
as 1:2023md03072
In Re:
In Re: Air Crash into the Java Sea on January 9, 2021
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Kastenbaum, Ridwan, Yusri Lanita and others
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Cox v. Iqbal, et al
as 3:2022cv00708
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel J. Cox
Defendant:
Unknown, Dr. Iqbal, Larry Edmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smarr v. Armor et al
as 1:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Smarr
Defendant:
Armor, Harold Clarke, Mack Bailey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allied World Insurance Company v. ICS Nett, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Allied World Insurance Company
Defendant:
ICS Nett, Inc., Shehraze Shah and Saadia Iqbal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
US v. Humaira Iqbal
as 21-7229
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HUMAIRA IQBAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
