Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Iraheta v. Iraheta
as 4:2024cv02665
Plaintiff:
Margarita Iraheta
Defendant:
Jose De La Cruz Iraheta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Revelo-Belloso, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4836
Petitioner:
ANGELICA MARICRUZ GOMEZ-IRAHETA, OSCAR ANTONIO REVELO-BELLOSO and MATTHEW ESAU REVELO-GOMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Luz Iraheta v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv03947
Plaintiff:
Luz Iraheta
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation, a Washington Corporation, DOES 1-100,, Starbucks Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
USA v. Iraheta-Alvarez
as 24-50244
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Benito Iraheta-Alvarez
Iraheta v. Doe (1) et al
as 4:2024cv01163
Plaintiff:
Jose D. Iraheta
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Velasco-Iraheta, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1826
Petitioner:
ROXANA VELASCO-IRAHETA and MARIA BENITEZ-VELASCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Iraheta, et al. v. Garland
as 24-187
Petitioner:
DILCIA M IRAHETA, FRANCISCO IRAHETA, CARLOS RIVAS IRAHETA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Velasco-Andrade, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4296
Petitioner:
CRISTINA XIOMARA VELASCO-ANDRADE and MARIA GUADALUPE IRAHETA-VELASCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Tracy Schroeder et al v. Los Angeles Unified School District
as 2:2023cv10307
Plaintiff:
Tracy Schroeder, Mark Aaron, Olga Aguilar and others
Defendant:
Los Angeles Unified School District, Alberto Carvalho, Megan Reilly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
