Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Woods v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Woods and Demetrius L Woods
Defendant:
Doe, Gary Musslelwhite, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dill et al
as 4:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Kevin Williams
Defendant:
Dill, Isaac Wade, Pickett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tommy Kimball v. Aundrea Culclager, et al
as 23-1390
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tommy J. Kimball
Defendant / Appellee:
Aundrea Culclager, Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC, Jeremy Andrews, Deputy Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC, Clyde Daniels, Building Major, Cummins Unit, ADC and others
Dunahue v. Reed et al
as 4:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Defendant:
Marshall Reed, Aundrea Culclager, Kenneth Starks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormack v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Michael McCormack
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Reid, Jeremy Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunahue v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00959
Plaintiff:
Reginald L Dunahue
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall D Reed, Aundrea Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00378
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Aundrea Culclager, Chris Budnik and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimball v. Culclager et al
as 4:2021cv00348
Defendant:
Curry Branham, Jeremy Andrews, Justus Motton and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy J Kimball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Kelly et al
as 5:2018cv00305
Defendant:
Bass, Marshall Reed, Patrick Pierre and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowley v. Musclewhite et al
as 5:2018cv00122
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Crowley
Defendant:
Musclewhite, Budnik, Vernon Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
