Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MATA III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03238
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL MATA III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mata et al v. Safeport Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv01572
Plaintiff:
Israel Mata and Emilia Mata
Defendant:
Safeport Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv03763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mata v. Spring Independent School District
as 4:2017mc03183
Plaintiff:
Israel Mata
Defendant:
Spring Independent School District
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Israel Mata-Camacho v. Jeffrey Van Winkle, et al
as 14-16657
Petitioner - Appellant:
ISRAEL MATA-CAMACHO
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY VAN WINKLE and ATTRONEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Mata-Camacho v. Van Winkle et al
as 2:2013cv00961
Petitioner:
Israel Mata-Camacho
Respondent:
Jeffrey Van Winkle and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia et al v. Bailey et al
as 1:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Elvia Garcia , Marylu Garcia , Agustin Garcia and others
Defendant:
Lewis Marshall Bailey, IV, Lewis Marshall Bailey, III and Jesus Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
Almendariz et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 1:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Jose Cruz Almendariz , Filemon Barajas , Arnoldo Charles and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Eleuterio Cortez and ADS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
Carlos Mata Graterol v. US Attorney General
as 12-14162
Petitioner:
CARLOS ISRAEL MATA GRATEROL
Respondent:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL
Carlos Mata Graterol v. U.S. Attorney General
as 11-14470
Petitioner:
CARLOS ISRAEL MATA GRATEROL
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
