Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Sanders v. Rodriguez et al
as 6:2022cv06064
Plaintiff:
Jay Daniel Sanders
Defendant:
Deputy US Marshal Issac Rodriguez, Investigator Allen Constant, Chief Deputy Stephen Elrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bottorff v. Dominicis et al
as 4:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones, Wellpath LLC and Victor Sean Bottorff
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dominicis et al
as 4:2021cv00731
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Dominicis et al
as 3:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones and Wellpath LLC
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Williams et al
as 6:2021cv06098
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Rico Williams, James Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Hamilton, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Williams et al
as 4:2021cv00473
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Rico Williams, James Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Hamilton, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchinson v. Reeves et al
as 1:2019cv00103
Defendant:
Chris Johnson, North Central Unit, Justin B Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. James et al
as 5:2018cv00259
Defendant:
P Johnson, Kedrick R Avery, Patrick Pierre and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Wade et al
as 5:2018cv00232
Plaintiff:
Adam E Lane
Defendant:
Pieere, Straughn, Rory Griffen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Wade et al
as 5:2018cv00231
Defendant:
Pierre, Straughn, Rory Griffen and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
