Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Staggs et al v. Doctors Hospital of Manteca, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00414
Plaintiff:
Linnie Staggs and Melissa Staggs
Defendant:
Doctor's Hospital of Manteca, Inc., Ivan D. Clay, Tim Virga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moises A. Manzano v. Ivan D. Clay et al
as 2:2009cv07575
Plaintiff:
Moises A. Manzano
Defendant:
Ivan D. Clay and Superior Court for The County of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Moises Manzano v. Ivan D. Clay
as 2:2009cv06817
Plaintiff:
Moises Manzano
Defendant:
Ivan D. Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Fred Arthur Burr Jr. v. Ivan D. Clay
as 5:2009cv01731
Petitioner:
Fred Arthur Burr, Jr
Respondent:
Ivan D Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tomala v. Davis, et al
as 1:2009cv01600
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Tomala
Defendant:
Troy Davis, W Semsen, Ivan D Clay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tomala v. Davis, et al
as 2:2009cv02479
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Tomala
Defendant:
Troy Davis, W Semsen, Ivan D Clay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdivia v. Clay
as 1:2009cv01443
Petitioner:
Moses Valdivia
Respondent:
Ivan D. Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moses Valdivia v. Ivan D. Clay
as 2:2009cv05678
Petitioner:
Moses Valdivia
Respondent:
Ivan D. Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Other Statutes
Ottoniel Munoz v. Ivan D. Clay
as 2:2009cv05209
Petitioner:
Ottoniel Munoz
Respondent:
Ivan D. Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Moore v. Bal et al
as 2:2009at01080
Plaintiff:
Jack Samuel Moore
Defendant:
Jasdeep Bal, James Walker, Jack St. Clair and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
