Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Eric Knapp v. Ivan Clay, et al
as 13-17108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY KNAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
IVAN D. CLAY, T. ESQUER, GIBB and others
Linnie Staggs, et al v. Doctor's Hospital of Manteca,, et al
as 13-16086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINNIE STAGGS, as administrator of the Estate of Robert E. Staggs, deceased and MELISSA STAGGS
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR'S HOSPITAL OF MANTECA, INC., IVAN D. CLAY, Warden, TIM VIRGA, Warden and others
Eric Knapp v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 11-17835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY KNAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, CALHOUN, IVAN D. CLAY and others
Staggs et al v. Doctors Hospital of Manteca, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00414
Plaintiff:
Linnie Staggs and Melissa Staggs
Defendant:
Doctor's Hospital of Manteca, Inc., Ivan D. Clay, Tim Virga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Tomala v. Troy Davis, et al
as 10-17913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES THOMAS TOMALA
Defendant - Appellee:
TROY DAVIS, W. SEMSEN, IVAN D. CLAY and others
Khalafala Khalafala v. Kramer, et al
as 10-16165
Petitioner:
KHALAFALA MOHAMED KHALAFALA, AKA Khalafa M. Khalafala
Respondent - Appellee:
KRAMER, Director of CDC, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and IVAN D. CLAY, Warden
Ivan Serrano v. Ivan Clay
as 10-55490
Petitioner - Appellant:
IVAN SERRANO
Respondent - Appellee:
IVAN D. CLAY, Prison Warden
Moises A. Manzano v. Ivan D. Clay et al
as 2:2009cv07575
Plaintiff:
Moises A. Manzano
Defendant:
Ivan D. Clay and Superior Court for The County of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Moises Manzano v. Ivan D. Clay
as 2:2009cv06817
Plaintiff:
Moises Manzano
Defendant:
Ivan D. Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Fred Arthur Burr Jr. v. Ivan D. Clay
as 5:2009cv01731
Petitioner:
Fred Arthur Burr, Jr
Respondent:
Ivan D Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
