Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Thompson v. Radtke et al
as 2:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
David J Thompson
Defendant:
D Radtke, A DeGroot, Sgt Friedi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Crisci
as 2:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
David J Thompson
Defendant:
CO Crisci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. MAINTECH, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
BRIAN J. THOMPSON
Defendant:
MAINTECH, INC., JOYCE G. GARDNER, WILLIAM M. GARDNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thompson v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq00075
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Thompson
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Martin v. Thompson et al
as 2:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Arthur Martin
Defendant:
Andrew J. Thompson and Shapero & Roloff Co., L.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
THOMPSON v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
CAMERSON J. THOMPSON and CAMERON J. THOMPSON
Defendant:
DAVE WEDDING, COWLING, CULVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERNACCHI v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2021cv00360
Plaintiff:
BRYCE BERNACCHI
Defendant:
C. MARTINEZ and J. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAUDILL v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00030
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEW CAUDILL
Defendant:
ADAMS, RICHARD BROWN, J. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Ward et al
as 2:2020cv02269
Plaintiff:
Jose R Tate
Defendant:
Kelsie Ward, J Thompson and Pat Hartshorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Thompson
as 1:2020cv05205
Defendant:
Geoffrey J Thompson
Plaintiff:
United States Securities & Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
