Cases 1 - 10 of 25,376
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
SAMPSON v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02055
Plaintiff:
DEREK LEROY SAMPSON
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stockton v. Little et al
as 1:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
George Little, John Wetzel, Thomas McGinley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAREY v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
THOMAS J. CAREY, JR.
Respondent:
COLETTE S. PETERS and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
MYERS v. CLEVELAND-CLIFFS et al
as 2:2024cv00684
Defendant:
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS, UAW - UNITED AUTO WORKERS, AK STEEL and others
Plaintiff:
JOE MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Smith-Egizio v. Rivello et al
as 1:2024cv00767
Petitioner:
Tyler Smith-Egizio
Respondent:
Superintendent J. Rivello, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and PA Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinshaw v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Jason Dewight Hinshaw
Defendant:
Keri L. Moore, John Rivello, John Kohler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDAWAY v. HARDAWAY et al
as 2:2024cv02014
Plaintiff:
AVERY JAMES HARDAWAY
Defendant:
MARQUES J. HARDAWAY, JUSTIN GRESKIEWICZ, WIL RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
