Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Shandhini Raidoo, et al v. Leevin Camacho, et al
as 21-16559
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHANDHINI RAIDOO, M.D., M.P.H. and BLISS KANESHIRO, M.D., M.P.H., on behalf of themselves and their patients
Defendant / Appellant:
LEEVIN TAITANO CAMACHO, Leevin Taitano Camacho in his official capacity as Attorney General of Guam, NATHANIEL BERG, M.D., in his official capacity as Chair of the Guam Board of Medical Examiners, PHILIP FLORES, in his official capacity as Vice-Chair of the Guam Board of Medical Examiners and others
Raidoo et al v. Camacho, et al.
as 1:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Arthur San Agustin, Antonio Rapadas, Nathaniel Berg and others
Plaintiff:
Bliss Kaneshiro and Shandhini Raidoo
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02363
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Young v. Contra Costa Conty Sheriff's et al
as 5:2011cv01890
Petitioner:
Donnell E. Young
Respondent:
Contra Costa Conty Sheriff's, David O. Livingston, J. Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. County of Contra Costa Office of the Sheriff et al
as 3:2011cv01233
Plaintiff:
Donnell Young
Defendant:
County of Contra Costa Office of the Sheriff, David O. Livingstons, J. Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. County of Contra Costa Office of the Sheriff et al
as 3:2011cv00997
Plaintiff:
Donnell Young
Defendant:
County of Contra Costa Office of the Sheriff, David O. Livingston, J. Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
E Sanchez et al v. William J Bratton et al
as 2:2004cv09991
Plaintiff:
E Sanchez, R Sanchez, C Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
William J Bratton, Willie L Williams, Daryl F Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
