Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Cook v. Synacor, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02271
Defendant:
Himesh Bhise, Elisabeth B. Donohue, Andrew Kau and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Cook
Kent v. Synacor, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02276
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Himesh Bhise, Kevin M. Rendino, Elisabeth B. Donohue and others
Perkins v. Synacor, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02250
Defendant:
Himesh Bhise, Kevin M. Rendino, Elisabeth B. Donohue and others
Plaintiff:
Jamel Perkins
Delgado v. Synacor, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02054
Defendant:
Himesh Bhise, Kevin M. Rendino, Elisabeth B. Donohue and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Delgado
GemCap Lending I, LLC v. Pertl et al
as 4:2020mc09007
Defendant:
William Shane Pertl, Jonathon W. Davis, Van Osdol PC and others
Plaintiff:
GemCap Lending I, LLC
MONTGOMERY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv65792
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARIAN J MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gemcap Lending I, LLC v. William Pertl, et al
as 20-55642
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM SHANE PERTL, an individual and MINDY J. MONTGOMERY, an individual
Defendant:
DOES, 1-25, inclusive, JONATHON W. DAVIS, an individual, MARTIN MCNEIL, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GEMCAP LENDING I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
GemCap Lending I, LLC v. Shane William Pertl et al
as 2:2019cv02481
Defendant:
William Shane Pertl, Van Osdol, PC, Jonathon W. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
GemCap Lending I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wright v. Montgomery et al
as 1:2019cv00263
Defendant:
Mr Dennis Montgomery, Loretta J Montgomery, Jeannie Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Jean M WRIGHT and Jean Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Brandt v. Bhise et al
as 1:2019cv02263
Defendant:
Kuo-Yen Kau, Himesh Bhise, Elisabeth B. Donohue and others
Nominal Defendant:
Synacor, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eric Brandt
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
