Cases 1 - 10 of 77
French v. Montgomery et al
as 9:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Darren French and Daren French
Defendant:
J. Montgomery, Sgt. Extrand, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTGOMERY v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02108
Plaintiff:
STEVEN J MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Deshawn Chappell v.N. McDowell et al
as 5:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Chappell
Defendant:
N. McDowell, S. Lopez, N. Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uren v. Maze et al
as 3:2022cv03049
Plaintiff:
Bradley Thomas Uren
Defendant:
Sgt. T. Maze, Sgt. C. Maple, Sgt. K. James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chappell v. McDowell et al
as 3:2022cv01241
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Chappell
Defendant:
N. McDowell, S. Lopez, N. Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander Argentina v. Timothy Hazel, et al
as 22-1844
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER ARGENTINA
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY HAZEL, Member, WAYNE FARGOTSTEIN, Vice Chair, RICHARD SNIPE, Secretary and others
Defendant:
WAYNE FARGOTSTEIN, Board Administrator, TIMOTHY HAZEL, Board Administrator, DAVID J. MONTGOMERY, Board Administrator and others
Davis v. Lindley et al
as 9:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Anita Lindley, Ernestine Julye, Laurie J Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ahjeeb Jamal Boyd Jr. v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2021cv05616
Plaintiff:
Ahjeeb Jamal Boyd, Jr.
Defendant:
Neil McDowell, E. Winbush, F. Duenas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Synacor, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02320
Defendant:
Himesh Bhise, Kevin M. Rendino, Elisabeth B. Donohue and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Bushansky v. Synacor, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02268
Defendant:
Himesh Bhise, Kevin M. Rendino, Elisabeth B. Donohue and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
